|
|
|
|
LEADER |
05971cam a22008892 4500 |
001 |
0-1008661228 |
003 |
DE-627 |
005 |
20220726181711.0 |
007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
008 |
180315s2012 xxu|||||o 00| ||eng c |
020 |
|
|
|a 9780833076403
|c e-book
|9 978-0-8330-7640-3
|
020 |
|
|
|a 0833078968
|c : e-book
|9 0-8330-7896-8
|
020 |
|
|
|a 083307895X
|9 0-8330-7895-X
|
020 |
|
|
|a 083307640X
|9 0-8330-7640-X
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9780833078957
|9 978-0-8330-7895-7
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9780833078964
|c : e-book
|9 978-0-8330-7896-4
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)1008661228
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-576)501122931
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)GBV1008661228
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)875239171
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)885220853
|
035 |
|
|
|a (EBP)014415798
|
035 |
|
|
|a (MiAaJST)j.ctt24hrwr
|
040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b eng
|c DE-627
|e rda
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
044 |
|
|
|c XD-US
|
050 |
|
0 |
|a TD812.2
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 363.72/895610973
|
084 |
|
|
|a POL044000
|2 bisacsh
|
084 |
|
|
|a BUS 032000
|2 bisacsh
|
084 |
|
|
|a BUS070040
|2 bisacsh
|
084 |
|
|
|a HIS036000
|2 bisacsh
|
084 |
|
|
|a SOC 000000
|2 bisacsh
|
088 |
|
|
|a RAND MG1230
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Davis, Lynn Etheridge
|4 aut
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Choosing a new organization for management and disposition of commercial and defense high-level radioactive materials
|c Lynn E. Davis [and four others], with Paul Steinberg [and four others]
|
264 |
|
1 |
|a Santa Monica, CA
|b RAND
|c 2012
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 Online-Ressource (xxvi, 100 pages)
|
336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
490 |
0 |
|
|a RAND Corporation monograph series
|v MG1230
|
500 |
|
|
|a Includes bibliographical references (pages 93-100)
|
520 |
|
|
|a Following the President's decision in January 2010 to withdraw the license application for a geologic repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, the Secretary of Energy established the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future (BRC) to consider alternatives to the nation's current institutional arrangements for management and disposition of used fuel and defense high-level nuclear waste. In February 2012, the BRC issued its final report. Among its recommendations was a call for a new, single purpose organization to be established to replace the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) that had been established under the authority of the 1982 Nuclear Waste Policy Act. The BRC suggested that a congressionally chartered federal corporation offers the most promising model, but the commission left open the possibility of alternative concepts to achieve the desired ends. In response to this recommendation, DOE asked the RAND Corporation to examine alternative organizational models for such a new management and disposition organization (MDO). Our study supports the work of DOE's Office of Nuclear Energy and the Management and Disposition Working Group (MDWG) formed to consider implementation options and activities
|
520 |
|
|
|a Following the President's decision in January 2010 to withdraw the license application for a geologic repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, the Secretary of Energy established the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future (BRC) to consider alternatives to the nation's current institutional arrangements for management and disposition of used fuel and defense high-level nuclear waste. In February 2012, the BRC issued its final report. Among its recommendations was a call for a new, single purpose organization to be established to replace the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) that had been established under the authority of the 1982 Nuclear Waste Policy Act. The BRC suggested that a congressionally chartered federal corporation offers the most promising model, but the commission left open the possibility of alternative concepts to achieve the desired ends. In response to this recommendation, DOE asked the RAND Corporation to examine alternative organizational models for such a new management and disposition organization (MDO). Our study supports the work of DOE's Office of Nuclear Energy and the Management and Disposition Working Group (MDWG) formed to consider implementation options and activities
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Radioactive wastes
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Radioactive waste disposal
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Radioactive wastes
|x Storage
|x Government policy
|z United States
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Radioactive waste disposal
|x Government policy
|z United States
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a POLITICAL SCIENCE ; Public Policy ; Environmental Policy
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a BUSINESS & ECONOMICS ; Infrastructure
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a SOCIAL SCIENCE ; General
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Radioactive waste disposal ; Government policy
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a United States
|
655 |
|
0 |
|a Electronic books
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Steinberg, Paul S.
|4 oth
|
776 |
1 |
|
|z 9780833076403
|
776 |
0 |
8 |
|n Druck-Ausgabe
|w (DE-600)10818054
|
776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Print version
|a Davis, Lynn E
|t Choosing a new organization for management and disposition of commercial and defense high-level radioactive materials
|d Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 2012
|h xxvi, 100 pages
|w (DLC)10818054
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt24hrwr
|m X:JSTOR
|x Verlag
|z kostenfrei
|3 Volltext
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt24hrwr
|m X:JSTOR
|x Verlag
|z kostenfrei
|
912 |
|
|
|a ZDB-39-JOA
|
935 |
|
|
|i Blocktest
|
951 |
|
|
|a BO
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt24hrwr
|9 LFER
|
852 |
|
|
|a LFER
|z 2018-03-15T16:12:21Z
|
970 |
|
|
|c OD
|
971 |
|
|
|c EBOOK
|
972 |
|
|
|c EBOOK
|
973 |
|
|
|c EB
|
935 |
|
|
|a lfer
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt24hrwr
|9 DE-540
|
852 |
|
|
|a DE-540
|z 2019-04-04T10:37:10Z
|
852 |
|
|
|a DE-L189
|z 2020-02-07T13:53:35Z
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt24hrwr
|9 DE-D117
|
852 |
|
|
|a DE-D117
|z 2018-10-15T14:58:20Z
|
980 |
|
|
|a 1008661228
|b 0
|k 1008661228
|o 501122931
|c lfer
|
SOLR
_version_ |
1750123326704975872 |
access_facet |
Electronic Resources |
author |
Davis, Lynn Etheridge |
author2 |
Steinberg, Paul S. |
author2_role |
oth |
author2_variant |
p s s ps pss |
author_facet |
Davis, Lynn Etheridge, Steinberg, Paul S. |
author_role |
aut |
author_sort |
Davis, Lynn Etheridge |
author_variant |
l e d le led |
callnumber-first |
T - Technology |
callnumber-label |
TD812 |
callnumber-raw |
TD812.2 |
callnumber-search |
TD812.2 |
callnumber-sort |
TD 3812.2 |
callnumber-subject |
TD - Environmental Technology |
collection |
ZDB-39-JOA, lfer |
contents |
Following the President's decision in January 2010 to withdraw the license application for a geologic repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, the Secretary of Energy established the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future (BRC) to consider alternatives to the nation's current institutional arrangements for management and disposition of used fuel and defense high-level nuclear waste. In February 2012, the BRC issued its final report. Among its recommendations was a call for a new, single purpose organization to be established to replace the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) that had been established under the authority of the 1982 Nuclear Waste Policy Act. The BRC suggested that a congressionally chartered federal corporation offers the most promising model, but the commission left open the possibility of alternative concepts to achieve the desired ends. In response to this recommendation, DOE asked the RAND Corporation to examine alternative organizational models for such a new management and disposition organization (MDO). Our study supports the work of DOE's Office of Nuclear Energy and the Management and Disposition Working Group (MDWG) formed to consider implementation options and activities |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)1008661228, (DE-576)501122931, (DE-599)GBV1008661228, (OCoLC)875239171, (OCoLC)885220853, (EBP)014415798, (MiAaJST)j.ctt24hrwr |
dewey-full |
363.72/895610973 |
dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones |
363 - Other social problems & services |
dewey-raw |
363.72/895610973 |
dewey-search |
363.72/895610973 |
dewey-sort |
3363.72 9895610973 |
dewey-tens |
360 - Social problems & social services |
facet_912a |
ZDB-39-JOA |
facet_avail |
Online, Free |
finc_class_facet |
Soziologie, Technik |
finc_id_str |
0020989550 |
fincclass_txtF_mv |
science-environmental, socialsciences |
footnote |
Includes bibliographical references (pages 93-100) |
format |
eBook |
format_access_txtF_mv |
Book, E-Book |
format_de105 |
Ebook |
format_de14 |
Book, E-Book |
format_de15 |
Book, E-Book |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_detail_txtF_mv |
text-online-monograph-independent |
format_dezi4 |
e-Book |
format_finc |
Book, E-Book |
format_legacy |
ElectronicBook |
format_legacy_nrw |
Book, E-Book |
format_nrw |
Book, E-Book |
format_strict_txtF_mv |
E-Book |
genre |
Electronic books |
genre_facet |
Electronic books |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
geographic_facet |
United States |
id |
0-1008661228 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
imprint |
Santa Monica, CA, RAND, 2012 |
imprint_str_mv |
Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2012 |
institution |
DE-D117, DE-105, LFER, DE-Ch1, DE-15, DE-540, DE-14, DE-L189, DE-L242, DE-Zwi2 |
is_hierarchy_id |
|
is_hierarchy_title |
|
isbn |
9780833076403, 0833078968, 083307895X, 083307640X, 9780833078957, 9780833078964 |
isbn_isn_mv |
9780833076403 |
isil_str_mv |
LFER, DE-540, DE-L189, DE-D117 |
kxp_id_str |
1008661228 |
language |
English |
last_indexed |
2022-11-21T16:21:05.365Z |
local_heading_facet_dezwi2 |
Radioactive wastes, Radioactive waste disposal, POLITICAL SCIENCE ; Public Policy ; Environmental Policy, BUSINESS & ECONOMICS ; Infrastructure, SOCIAL SCIENCE ; General, Radioactive waste disposal ; Government policy, United States, Storage, Government policy |
match_str |
davis2012choosinganeworganizationformanagementanddispositionofcommercialanddefensehighlevelradioactivematerials |
mega_collection |
Verbunddaten SWB, Lizenzfreie Online-Ressourcen |
misc_de105 |
EBOOK |
oclc_num |
875239171, 885220853 |
physical |
1 Online-Ressource (xxvi, 100 pages) |
publishDate |
2012 |
publishDateSort |
2012 |
publishPlace |
Santa Monica, CA |
publisher |
RAND |
record_format |
marcfinc |
record_id |
501122931 |
recordtype |
marcfinc |
rvk_facet |
No subject assigned |
score |
17,722382 |
series2 |
RAND Corporation monograph series ; MG1230 |
source_id |
0 |
spelling |
Davis, Lynn Etheridge aut, Choosing a new organization for management and disposition of commercial and defense high-level radioactive materials Lynn E. Davis [and four others], with Paul Steinberg [and four others], Santa Monica, CA RAND 2012, 1 Online-Ressource (xxvi, 100 pages), Text txt rdacontent, Computermedien c rdamedia, Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier, RAND Corporation monograph series MG1230, Includes bibliographical references (pages 93-100), Following the President's decision in January 2010 to withdraw the license application for a geologic repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, the Secretary of Energy established the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future (BRC) to consider alternatives to the nation's current institutional arrangements for management and disposition of used fuel and defense high-level nuclear waste. In February 2012, the BRC issued its final report. Among its recommendations was a call for a new, single purpose organization to be established to replace the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) that had been established under the authority of the 1982 Nuclear Waste Policy Act. The BRC suggested that a congressionally chartered federal corporation offers the most promising model, but the commission left open the possibility of alternative concepts to achieve the desired ends. In response to this recommendation, DOE asked the RAND Corporation to examine alternative organizational models for such a new management and disposition organization (MDO). Our study supports the work of DOE's Office of Nuclear Energy and the Management and Disposition Working Group (MDWG) formed to consider implementation options and activities, Radioactive wastes, Radioactive waste disposal, Radioactive wastes Storage Government policy United States, Radioactive waste disposal Government policy United States, POLITICAL SCIENCE ; Public Policy ; Environmental Policy, BUSINESS & ECONOMICS ; Infrastructure, SOCIAL SCIENCE ; General, Radioactive waste disposal ; Government policy, United States, Electronic books, Steinberg, Paul S. oth, 9780833076403, Druck-Ausgabe (DE-600)10818054, Print version Davis, Lynn E Choosing a new organization for management and disposition of commercial and defense high-level radioactive materials Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 2012 xxvi, 100 pages (DLC)10818054, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt24hrwr X:JSTOR Verlag kostenfrei Volltext, https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt24hrwr X:JSTOR Verlag kostenfrei, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt24hrwr LFER, LFER 2018-03-15T16:12:21Z, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt24hrwr DE-540, DE-540 2019-04-04T10:37:10Z, DE-L189 2020-02-07T13:53:35Z, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt24hrwr DE-D117, DE-D117 2018-10-15T14:58:20Z |
spellingShingle |
Davis, Lynn Etheridge, Choosing a new organization for management and disposition of commercial and defense high-level radioactive materials, Following the President's decision in January 2010 to withdraw the license application for a geologic repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, the Secretary of Energy established the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future (BRC) to consider alternatives to the nation's current institutional arrangements for management and disposition of used fuel and defense high-level nuclear waste. In February 2012, the BRC issued its final report. Among its recommendations was a call for a new, single purpose organization to be established to replace the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) that had been established under the authority of the 1982 Nuclear Waste Policy Act. The BRC suggested that a congressionally chartered federal corporation offers the most promising model, but the commission left open the possibility of alternative concepts to achieve the desired ends. In response to this recommendation, DOE asked the RAND Corporation to examine alternative organizational models for such a new management and disposition organization (MDO). Our study supports the work of DOE's Office of Nuclear Energy and the Management and Disposition Working Group (MDWG) formed to consider implementation options and activities, Radioactive wastes, Radioactive waste disposal, Radioactive wastes Storage Government policy United States, Radioactive waste disposal Government policy United States, POLITICAL SCIENCE ; Public Policy ; Environmental Policy, BUSINESS & ECONOMICS ; Infrastructure, SOCIAL SCIENCE ; General, Radioactive waste disposal ; Government policy, United States, Electronic books |
swb_id_str |
501122931 |
title |
Choosing a new organization for management and disposition of commercial and defense high-level radioactive materials |
title_auth |
Choosing a new organization for management and disposition of commercial and defense high-level radioactive materials |
title_full |
Choosing a new organization for management and disposition of commercial and defense high-level radioactive materials Lynn E. Davis [and four others], with Paul Steinberg [and four others] |
title_fullStr |
Choosing a new organization for management and disposition of commercial and defense high-level radioactive materials Lynn E. Davis [and four others], with Paul Steinberg [and four others] |
title_full_unstemmed |
Choosing a new organization for management and disposition of commercial and defense high-level radioactive materials Lynn E. Davis [and four others], with Paul Steinberg [and four others] |
title_short |
Choosing a new organization for management and disposition of commercial and defense high-level radioactive materials |
title_sort |
choosing a new organization for management and disposition of commercial and defense high level radioactive materials |
topic |
Radioactive wastes, Radioactive waste disposal, Radioactive wastes Storage Government policy United States, Radioactive waste disposal Government policy United States, POLITICAL SCIENCE ; Public Policy ; Environmental Policy, BUSINESS & ECONOMICS ; Infrastructure, SOCIAL SCIENCE ; General, Radioactive waste disposal ; Government policy, United States, Electronic books |
topic_facet |
Radioactive wastes, Radioactive waste disposal, POLITICAL SCIENCE ; Public Policy ; Environmental Policy, BUSINESS & ECONOMICS ; Infrastructure, SOCIAL SCIENCE ; General, Radioactive waste disposal ; Government policy, United States, Storage, Government policy, Electronic books |
url |
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt24hrwr, https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt24hrwr |