|
|
|
|
LEADER |
05922cam a22008652 4500 |
001 |
0-1008655341 |
003 |
DE-627 |
005 |
20220726181652.0 |
007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
008 |
180315s2010 xxu|||||o 00| ||eng c |
020 |
|
|
|a 9780833051080
|c electronic bk.
|9 978-0-8330-5108-0
|
020 |
|
|
|a 0833051156
|c : electronic bk.
|9 0-8330-5115-6
|
020 |
|
|
|a 0833051083
|9 0-8330-5108-3
|
020 |
|
|
|a 9780833051158
|c : electronic bk.
|9 978-0-8330-5115-8
|
027 |
|
|
|a RAND/MG-970-RC
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)1008655341
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-576)501125035
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)GBV1008655341
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)701720062
|
035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)1030354441
|
035 |
|
|
|a (EBP)014409925
|
035 |
|
|
|a (MiAaJST)mg970rc
|
040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
044 |
|
|
|c XD-US
|
050 |
|
0 |
|a TD898.118
|
082 |
0 |
|
|a 363.72/895610973
|
084 |
|
|
|a BUS070040
|2 bisacsh
|
084 |
|
|
|a SCI026000
|2 bisacsh
|
084 |
|
|
|a SCI 026000
|2 bisacsh
|
084 |
|
|
|a SCI051000
|2 bisacsh
|
088 |
|
|
|a MG-970-RC
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Managing spent nuclear fuel
|b strategy alternatives and policy implications
|c Tom LaTourrette [and others]
|
264 |
|
1 |
|a Santa Monica, CA
|b RAND
|c 2010
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 Online-Ressource (xxiii, 71 pages)
|
336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
490 |
0 |
|
|a Rand Corporation monograph series
|v MG-970-RC
|
500 |
|
|
|a Includes bibliographical references (pages 63-71)
|
520 |
|
|
|a Increasing awareness of the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions has renewed interest in nuclear power generation. At the same time, the longstanding logjam over how to manage spent nuclear fuel continues to hamper the expansion of nuclear power. If nuclear power is to be a sustainable option for the United States, methods for managing spent fuel that meet stringent safety and environmental standards must be implemented. This monograph evaluates the main technical and institutional approaches to spent nuclear fuel management and identifies implications for the development of spent fuel management policy. The authors find that on-site storage, centralized interim storage, and permanent geological disposal are generally safe, secure, and low- to moderate-cost approaches with no insurmountable technical obstacles. Advanced fuel cycles enabling spent-fuel recycling could reduce waste repository capacity needs but are difficult to evaluate because they still in early research stages. Public acceptance challenges stand as a major impediment to any technical approach. The analysis shows that the technical approaches can be combined in different ways to form different spent fuel management strategies that can be distinguished primarily in terms of societal preferences in three areas: the disposition of spent fuel, the growth of nuclear power, and intergenerational trade-offs
|
520 |
|
|
|a Increasing awareness of the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions has renewed interest in nuclear power generation. At the same time, the longstanding logjam over how to manage spent nuclear fuel continues to hamper the expansion of nuclear power. If nuclear power is to be a sustainable option for the United States, methods for managing spent fuel that meet stringent safety and environmental standards must be implemented. This monograph evaluates the main technical and institutional approaches to spent nuclear fuel management and identifies implications for the development of spent fuel management policy. The authors find that on-site storage, centralized interim storage, and permanent geological disposal are generally safe, secure, and low- to moderate-cost approaches with no insurmountable technical obstacles. Advanced fuel cycles enabling spent-fuel recycling could reduce waste repository capacity needs but are difficult to evaluate because they still in early research stages. Public acceptance challenges stand as a major impediment to any technical approach. The analysis shows that the technical approaches can be combined in different ways to form different spent fuel management strategies that can be distinguished primarily in terms of societal preferences in three areas: the disposition of spent fuel, the growth of nuclear power, and intergenerational trade-offs
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Spent reactor fuels
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Radioactive waste disposal
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Spent reactor fuels
|x Storage
|x Government policy
|z United States
|
650 |
|
0 |
|a Radioactive waste disposal
|x Government policy
|z United States
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a SCIENCE ; Environmental Science
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a SCIENCE ; Physics ; Nuclear
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Radioactive waste disposal ; Government policy
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Spent reactor fuels ; Storage ; Government policy
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a United States
|
655 |
|
0 |
|a Electronic books
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a LaTourrette, Tom
|4 oth
|
710 |
2 |
|
|a Rand Environment, Energy, and Economic Development (Program)
|4 oth
|
776 |
1 |
|
|z 9780833051080
|
776 |
0 |
8 |
|n Druck-Ausgabe
|w (DE-600)2010045433
|
776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Print version
|t Managing spent nuclear fuel
|d Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 2010
|w (DLC)2010045433
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg970rc
|m X:JSTOR
|x Verlag
|z kostenfrei
|3 Volltext
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg970rc
|m X:JSTOR
|x Verlag
|z kostenfrei
|
912 |
|
|
|a ZDB-39-JOA
|
935 |
|
|
|i Blocktest
|
951 |
|
|
|a BO
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg970rc
|9 DE-540
|
852 |
|
|
|a DE-540
|z 2019-04-04T10:55:43Z
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg970rc
|9 LFER
|
852 |
|
|
|a LFER
|z 2018-03-15T16:12:28Z
|
970 |
|
|
|c OD
|
971 |
|
|
|c EBOOK
|
972 |
|
|
|c EBOOK
|
973 |
|
|
|c EB
|
935 |
|
|
|a lfer
|
852 |
|
|
|a DE-L189
|z 2020-02-07T13:54:19Z
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg970rc
|9 DE-D117
|
852 |
|
|
|a DE-D117
|z 2018-10-15T14:54:32Z
|
980 |
|
|
|a 1008655341
|b 0
|k 1008655341
|o 501125035
|c lfer
|
SOLR
_version_ |
1750123317455486976 |
access_facet |
Electronic Resources |
author2 |
LaTourrette, Tom |
author2_role |
oth |
author2_variant |
t l tl |
author_corporate |
Rand Environment, Energy, and Economic Development (Program) |
author_corporate_role |
oth |
author_facet |
LaTourrette, Tom, Rand Environment, Energy, and Economic Development (Program) |
callnumber-first |
T - Technology |
callnumber-label |
TD898 |
callnumber-raw |
TD898.118 |
callnumber-search |
TD898.118 |
callnumber-sort |
TD 3898.118 |
callnumber-subject |
TD - Environmental Technology |
collection |
ZDB-39-JOA, lfer |
contents |
Increasing awareness of the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions has renewed interest in nuclear power generation. At the same time, the longstanding logjam over how to manage spent nuclear fuel continues to hamper the expansion of nuclear power. If nuclear power is to be a sustainable option for the United States, methods for managing spent fuel that meet stringent safety and environmental standards must be implemented. This monograph evaluates the main technical and institutional approaches to spent nuclear fuel management and identifies implications for the development of spent fuel management policy. The authors find that on-site storage, centralized interim storage, and permanent geological disposal are generally safe, secure, and low- to moderate-cost approaches with no insurmountable technical obstacles. Advanced fuel cycles enabling spent-fuel recycling could reduce waste repository capacity needs but are difficult to evaluate because they still in early research stages. Public acceptance challenges stand as a major impediment to any technical approach. The analysis shows that the technical approaches can be combined in different ways to form different spent fuel management strategies that can be distinguished primarily in terms of societal preferences in three areas: the disposition of spent fuel, the growth of nuclear power, and intergenerational trade-offs |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)1008655341, (DE-576)501125035, (DE-599)GBV1008655341, (OCoLC)701720062, (OCoLC)1030354441, (EBP)014409925, (MiAaJST)mg970rc |
dewey-full |
363.72/895610973 |
dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones |
363 - Other social problems & services |
dewey-raw |
363.72/895610973 |
dewey-search |
363.72/895610973 |
dewey-sort |
3363.72 9895610973 |
dewey-tens |
360 - Social problems & social services |
facet_912a |
ZDB-39-JOA |
facet_avail |
Online, Free |
finc_class_facet |
Soziologie, Technik |
finc_id_str |
0020989754 |
fincclass_txtF_mv |
science-environmental, socialsciences |
footnote |
Includes bibliographical references (pages 63-71) |
format |
eBook |
format_access_txtF_mv |
Book, E-Book |
format_de105 |
Ebook |
format_de14 |
Book, E-Book |
format_de15 |
Book, E-Book |
format_del152 |
Buch |
format_detail_txtF_mv |
text-online-monograph-independent |
format_dezi4 |
e-Book |
format_finc |
Book, E-Book |
format_legacy |
ElectronicBook |
format_legacy_nrw |
Book, E-Book |
format_nrw |
Book, E-Book |
format_strict_txtF_mv |
E-Book |
genre |
Electronic books |
genre_facet |
Electronic books |
geogr_code |
not assigned |
geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
geographic_facet |
United States |
id |
0-1008655341 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
imprint |
Santa Monica, CA, RAND, 2010 |
imprint_str_mv |
Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2010 |
institution |
DE-D117, DE-105, LFER, DE-Ch1, DE-15, DE-540, DE-14, DE-L189, DE-L242, DE-Zwi2 |
is_hierarchy_id |
|
is_hierarchy_title |
|
isbn |
9780833051080, 0833051156, 0833051083, 9780833051158 |
isbn_isn_mv |
9780833051080 |
isil_str_mv |
DE-540, LFER, DE-L189, DE-D117 |
kxp_id_str |
1008655341 |
language |
English |
last_indexed |
2022-11-21T16:20:56.31Z |
local_heading_facet_dezwi2 |
Spent reactor fuels, Radioactive waste disposal, SCIENCE ; Environmental Science, SCIENCE ; Physics ; Nuclear, Radioactive waste disposal ; Government policy, Spent reactor fuels ; Storage ; Government policy, United States, Storage, Government policy |
match_str |
latourrette2010managingspentnuclearfuelstrategyalternativesandpolicyimplications |
mega_collection |
Verbunddaten SWB, Lizenzfreie Online-Ressourcen |
misc_de105 |
EBOOK |
oclc_num |
701720062, 1030354441 |
physical |
1 Online-Ressource (xxiii, 71 pages) |
publishDate |
2010 |
publishDateSort |
2010 |
publishPlace |
Santa Monica, CA |
publisher |
RAND |
record_format |
marcfinc |
record_id |
501125035 |
recordtype |
marcfinc |
rvk_facet |
No subject assigned |
series2 |
Rand Corporation monograph series ; MG-970-RC |
source_id |
0 |
spelling |
Managing spent nuclear fuel strategy alternatives and policy implications Tom LaTourrette [and others], Santa Monica, CA RAND 2010, 1 Online-Ressource (xxiii, 71 pages), Text txt rdacontent, Computermedien c rdamedia, Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier, Rand Corporation monograph series MG-970-RC, Includes bibliographical references (pages 63-71), Increasing awareness of the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions has renewed interest in nuclear power generation. At the same time, the longstanding logjam over how to manage spent nuclear fuel continues to hamper the expansion of nuclear power. If nuclear power is to be a sustainable option for the United States, methods for managing spent fuel that meet stringent safety and environmental standards must be implemented. This monograph evaluates the main technical and institutional approaches to spent nuclear fuel management and identifies implications for the development of spent fuel management policy. The authors find that on-site storage, centralized interim storage, and permanent geological disposal are generally safe, secure, and low- to moderate-cost approaches with no insurmountable technical obstacles. Advanced fuel cycles enabling spent-fuel recycling could reduce waste repository capacity needs but are difficult to evaluate because they still in early research stages. Public acceptance challenges stand as a major impediment to any technical approach. The analysis shows that the technical approaches can be combined in different ways to form different spent fuel management strategies that can be distinguished primarily in terms of societal preferences in three areas: the disposition of spent fuel, the growth of nuclear power, and intergenerational trade-offs, Spent reactor fuels, Radioactive waste disposal, Spent reactor fuels Storage Government policy United States, Radioactive waste disposal Government policy United States, SCIENCE ; Environmental Science, SCIENCE ; Physics ; Nuclear, Radioactive waste disposal ; Government policy, Spent reactor fuels ; Storage ; Government policy, United States, Electronic books, LaTourrette, Tom oth, Rand Environment, Energy, and Economic Development (Program) oth, 9780833051080, Druck-Ausgabe (DE-600)2010045433, Print version Managing spent nuclear fuel Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 2010 (DLC)2010045433, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg970rc X:JSTOR Verlag kostenfrei Volltext, https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg970rc X:JSTOR Verlag kostenfrei, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg970rc DE-540, DE-540 2019-04-04T10:55:43Z, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg970rc LFER, LFER 2018-03-15T16:12:28Z, DE-L189 2020-02-07T13:54:19Z, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg970rc DE-D117, DE-D117 2018-10-15T14:54:32Z |
spellingShingle |
Managing spent nuclear fuel: strategy alternatives and policy implications, Increasing awareness of the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions has renewed interest in nuclear power generation. At the same time, the longstanding logjam over how to manage spent nuclear fuel continues to hamper the expansion of nuclear power. If nuclear power is to be a sustainable option for the United States, methods for managing spent fuel that meet stringent safety and environmental standards must be implemented. This monograph evaluates the main technical and institutional approaches to spent nuclear fuel management and identifies implications for the development of spent fuel management policy. The authors find that on-site storage, centralized interim storage, and permanent geological disposal are generally safe, secure, and low- to moderate-cost approaches with no insurmountable technical obstacles. Advanced fuel cycles enabling spent-fuel recycling could reduce waste repository capacity needs but are difficult to evaluate because they still in early research stages. Public acceptance challenges stand as a major impediment to any technical approach. The analysis shows that the technical approaches can be combined in different ways to form different spent fuel management strategies that can be distinguished primarily in terms of societal preferences in three areas: the disposition of spent fuel, the growth of nuclear power, and intergenerational trade-offs, Spent reactor fuels, Radioactive waste disposal, Spent reactor fuels Storage Government policy United States, Radioactive waste disposal Government policy United States, SCIENCE ; Environmental Science, SCIENCE ; Physics ; Nuclear, Radioactive waste disposal ; Government policy, Spent reactor fuels ; Storage ; Government policy, United States, Electronic books |
swb_id_str |
501125035 |
title |
Managing spent nuclear fuel: strategy alternatives and policy implications |
title_auth |
Managing spent nuclear fuel strategy alternatives and policy implications |
title_full |
Managing spent nuclear fuel strategy alternatives and policy implications Tom LaTourrette [and others] |
title_fullStr |
Managing spent nuclear fuel strategy alternatives and policy implications Tom LaTourrette [and others] |
title_full_unstemmed |
Managing spent nuclear fuel strategy alternatives and policy implications Tom LaTourrette [and others] |
title_short |
Managing spent nuclear fuel |
title_sort |
managing spent nuclear fuel strategy alternatives and policy implications |
title_sub |
strategy alternatives and policy implications |
topic |
Spent reactor fuels, Radioactive waste disposal, Spent reactor fuels Storage Government policy United States, Radioactive waste disposal Government policy United States, SCIENCE ; Environmental Science, SCIENCE ; Physics ; Nuclear, Radioactive waste disposal ; Government policy, Spent reactor fuels ; Storage ; Government policy, United States, Electronic books |
topic_facet |
Spent reactor fuels, Radioactive waste disposal, SCIENCE ; Environmental Science, SCIENCE ; Physics ; Nuclear, Radioactive waste disposal ; Government policy, Spent reactor fuels ; Storage ; Government policy, United States, Storage, Government policy, Electronic books |
url |
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg970rc, https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg970rc |